STANTON — As the Stanton Planning Commission continues to draft proposed ordinances allowing medical and adult-use marijuana facilities in the city, city commissioners have different ideas of what marijuana-related regulations should look like.
During Tuesday’s meeting, disagreement broke out among commissioners when considering a proposal from MainStreet Planning Co. of Grand Rapids to assist the Planning Commission in drafting an ordinance to allow adult-use marijuana facilities within city limits.
The price for MainStreet Planning’s services came in at approximately $5,000.
In December, the City Commission initially approved a proposal to hire MainStreet Planning to assist the Planning Commission in drafting a medical marijuana ordinance for the city for $5,000.
One month later, the city then approved a proposal to amend the Planning Commission’s directions to include recreational marijuana in the upcoming ordinance drafts.
In approving Tuesday’s request, Commissioner and Planning Commission Chairman Charles Miel clarified that MainStreet Planning would still be assisting with the medical marijuana ordinance.
“We’re not dropping medical marijuana, we’re just adding adult-use,” Miel noted.
“They already had a contract (for medical), this is more of a formality,” City Manager Vester Davis agreed. “Our initial request (with MainStreet Planning) was for medical, only. We then went back to the drawing board and said that we wanted to do both.”
While Miel made a motion to accept MainStreet Planning’s proposal, Commissioner Ray Holloway voiced some concerns.
“I have something that is bothering me about moving forward with this project. I don’t know if everyone has seen the video (the Planning Commission) did for the last meeting, but it was suggested by Commissioner Miel to start over with medical marijuana,” Holloway said. “They had already submitted some (buffer) zoning for different uses — they were going to buffer for schools, buffer for churches, buffer for the Fred Meijer Heartland Trail and buffer for parks. During the last Planning Commission meeting, they took that all away.
“I just don’t know if we know the mindset of our own Planning Commission yet,” he said. “It’s too ambiguous. It’s…