
The U.S Justice Department has, since the time of the Cole Memorandum, taken a limited approach in pursing legal action against state-law compliant marijuana enterprises, instead concentrating on those operating “illicit” businesses in contravention of applicable state laws, a tack that has been echoed by U.S. Attorney General William Barr. However, despite the Attorney General’s statements and the recent dearth of proceedings against state-law-compliant actors, recreational marijuana companies remain subject to U.S. federal law and potential enforcement action thereunder. Thus, in keeping with the adage that “past performance is not a guarantee of future results”, the Weedmaps subpoena may be an indication that the Justice Department’s may be deviating from its establish path.
In the past, the receipt of a subpoena may not have seemed all too out of the ordinary for Weedmaps (or others in the industry, for that matter), given that they were usually only issued in connection with investigations of black-market dealings by third-parties, with whom Weedmaps may have had some interactions with. Therefore, while the instant subpoena does indeed name several such parties with potentially non-state-compliant operations, it is distinct in its request for a wide swath of documents and information relating to a significant number of high-profile marijuana companies, which are certainly a far cry away from the black-market cannabis operators that federal law enforcement usually targets. In addition to these well-known companies, which almost undoubtedly operate in compliance with applicable state laws, material regarding their shareholders, equity structure, corporate affiliates, and investment vehicles was also requested.
The subpoena, by including such a large number of state-law-compliant companies and seeking detailed information on their financial and corporate organizational structure, could be indicative of a general shift in the Justice Department’s strategy of marijuana law enforcement. Granted, the ultimate goal of the U.S. Attorney’s office in this case is unknown and its reasons for issuing the subpoena remain unclear. Nonetheless, the revelations derived from the subpoena provide a wakeup call to the industry and a reminder that, despite the increasing number of states that have legalized marijuana, it continues to remain illegal under federal law. As such, now more than ever, those operating or investing in state-licensed cannabis companies are well advised to take proper precautionary measures (e.g. securing robust insurance and indemnity packages), to act as a bulwark and mitigate the potential downsides of federal law enforcement action. Of paramount importance, they should also ensure that their operations maintain compliance with all applicable state cannabis laws, by implementing or updating corporate governance frameworks and compliance oversight measures, as necessary.
Source link








